Fancy schmancy. 21. New York.
Law student. Economics nerd. Environmental activist.
Photography, jazz, and unending quirks.
The Office, 30 Rock, Mad Men.
Be prepared for rants.
I'm not a hipster. I'm not even hip.
Check out my Sustainability, Economics, & Law tumblr!
___________________________________________________________________




Are Today’s Young Adults More Committed To Narcissism Than Environmentalism?

ecologicalanarchism:

A just-reported review of historic polls corroborates another one of my boomer centric theories: that many if not most young Treehugger readers didn’t bother to vote in the last mid-term election. If this were true, I felt, they should shoulder much of the blame for the anti-environmental political narrative led by the US Congress and Republican presidential candidates. I had no hard data to back up this idea; but, my own anecdotal observations* led me to toss out a definition for neo-environmentalism in a recent post. It was good bait for comments.

Neo-environmentalist definition.
1.) a US citizen who considers him/herself to be “green” and yet, while of voting age, is not registered to vote and/or did not vote in the mid-term election that brought Tea Party politics to the fore; 2.) does not realize that being apolitical is a political act; 3.) thinks lifestyle change will do the job.

Now, the data are compiled. Narcissism indeed floats the Millennial generation cigar boat.

Associated Press reports in Study: Young people not so ‘green’ after all that fewer Millennials vote and as many of them purposefully toss recyclables in the trash as faithfully recycle (in the 5% range).

…an academic analysis of surveys spanning more than 40 years has found that today’s young Americans are less interested in the environment and in conserving resources - and often less civic-minded overall - than their elders were when they were young.

City life isolates from environmental values
Also from the AP story:

A lot of young people also simply don’t spend that much time exploring nature, said Beth Christensen, a professor who heads the environmental studies program at Adelphi University on New York’s Long Island.

When she attended Rutgers University in the 1980s, she said it was unusual to find a fellow student who hadn’t hiked and spent time in the woods.

“Now a lot of these students have very little experience with the unpaved world,” Christensen said.


But they’re giving up on a lot more.

Based on two longstanding national surveys of high school seniors and college freshmen, Twenge and her colleagues found a decline, over the last four decades, in young people’s trust in others, their interest in government and the time they said they spent thinking about social problems.

Steepest of all was a steady decline in concern about the environment, and taking personal action to save it.

[John Laumer]

Interesting. My feelings resonate closely with Christensen’s ideas. 

climateadaptation:

Mike’s Environmental Jobs List

Want to add a website to this list? Click here to send me links.


http://www.stopdodo.com/
http://www.indeed.com/
http://jobs.treehugger.com/
http://www.opportunitynocs.org/
http://www.greenbiz.com/jobs/viewjobs.cfm
http://www.idealist.org/if/as/Job
http://www.monstertrak.monster.com/greencareers/

http://www.earthworks-jobs.com/index.shtml

http://www.eco.org/
http://www.greenjobs.com/
http://www.greenenergyjobs.com/
http://www.ecojobs.com/index.php
http://environmentalcareer.com/
http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/jobs/

Oh man, just another reason why this blog is great. If you’re into all things environment, you should really check climateadaptation out! And if you’re not, you should check it out anyways and learn a thing or two!

Barack Obama differentiating between natural gas and clean energy??

So happy that I could cry….

» Statistics released yesterday by the Global Carbon Project showed that carbon emissions had increased 5.9 % between 2009 and 2010. In fact, it was arguably among the most important pieces of data in the last, oh, three centuries, since according to the New York Times it represented “almost certainly the largest absolute jump in any year since the Industrial Revolution.”

joshsternberg:

Um?

What it means, in climate terms, is that we’ve all but lost the battle to reduce the damage from global warming. The planet has already warmed about a degree Celsius; it’s clearly going to go well past two degrees. It means, in political terms, that the fossil fuel industry has delayed effective action for the 12 years since the Kyoto treaty was signed. It means, in diplomatic terms, that the endless talks underway in Durban should be more important than ever—they should be the focus of a planetary population desperate to figure out how it’s going to survive the century.

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

» High steaks: Meat eaters’ climate impact by Tom LaSkawy

bohemianscholar:

 The Environmental Working Group (EWG) released the “Meat Eaters Guide to Climate Change + Health” Monday, and it contains a few surprises for climate-conscious eaters. EWG staffers linked up with lifecycle analysis firm CleanMetrics to come up with a nifty set of infographics and guidelines for health- and climate-conscious carnivores. It’s part of a recognition that industrialized societies are not about to go veg any time soon, so at least we can make sound judgements about how much and which kind of meat to eat.

According to EWG, the top five worst climate culprits are, in order: lamb, beef, cheese, pork, and farmed salmon. Cheese at No. 3 and salmon at No. 5 surprised me, and though lamb is the worst climate offender, it’s a tiny fraction of U.S. meat consumption and not a real contributor to our climate woes. For the record, lamb tops beef in climate impact mostly because of the smaller amount of meat per animal — not because of anything inherent in the way lamb is raised.

Cheese consumption, on the other hand, is through the roof, thanks in large part to government efforts to promote consumption. So it’s quite something to learn that it’s as bad as meat in terms of climate impact (not to mention health).

For low-impact meats, EWG recommends turkey, chicken, tuna, and eggs. Hang on — tuna? While I applaud them for documenting the fact that farmed salmon is not a sustainable option, I think recommending a source of protein that’s in the middle of an extinction crisis strikes me as a lame call. Bad, EWG, bad!

That said, a comparison of the relative climate impact of a reduction in your meat consumption remains one of the report’s best features. For example:

  • If you eat one less burger a week, it’s like taking your car off the road for 320 miles or line-drying your clothes half the time.
  • If your four-person family skips meat and cheese one day a week, it’s like taking your car off the road for five weeks — or reducing everyone’s daily showers by 3 minutes.
  • If your four-person family skips steak once a week, it’s like taking your car off the road for nearly three months.
  • If everyone in the U.S. ate no meat or cheese just one day a week, it would be like not driving 91 billion miles — or taking 7.6 million cars off the road.

For those of us who think about the climate impact of our everyday activities, it’s incredibly helpful to put small personal changes into context. Who knew one less burger a week could be so significant?

The main conclusion — no surprise here — is to eat less meat. But the EWG report also offers a good set of guidelines for eating “greener meat,” which has the following qualities:

  • Grass fed or pasture-raised meat has fewer antibiotics and hormones and in some cases may have more nutrients and less fat; livestock live in more humane, open, sanitary conditions.
  • Lean cuts: less fat will likely mean fewer cancer-causing toxins in your body.
  • No antibiotics or hormones: reduces unnecessary exposure and helps keep human medicines effective.
  • Certified organic: keeps pesticides, chemical fertilizers and genetically modified foods off the land, out of the water and out of our bodies.
  • Certified humane: means no growth hormones or antibiotics were used and ensures that animals were raised with enough space and no cages or crates.
  • Unprocessed, nitrite-free and low-sodium: avoid lunchmeats, hot dogs, prepackaged smoked meats and chicken nuggets.
  • Sustainable Seafood: avoid airfreighted fish and farmed salmon; consult Monterey Bay Aquarium’s list of the most sustainable seafood choices at montereybayaquarium.org/cr/seafoodwatch.aspx

Switching to pasture-raised meat appears to have another benefit unrelated to the climate fight. According to new research out of the University of California at Berkeley (and picked up by Nicolette Hahn Niman at The Atlantic), it just might save the bees.

Rangelands are technically “artificial environments,” but when properly managed they offer  “undisturbed ground, cavities in the ground and trees, and hollow-stemmed grasses and reeds that are suitable for species of ground-nesting, wood- and cavity-nesting, and stem-nesting bees.” Basically, paradise for wild bees.

The researchers used California as a case study and determined that despite colony collapse disorder (CCD), wild bees (most of whom live in rangelands) already represent between 35 and 39 percent of crop pollinators. Since pollination is a commercial industry, wild bees add between $937 million to $2.4 billion every year to the state’s economy. In fact, if more rangelands are developed and maintained near farm fields, it’s theoretically possible for farmers to rely almost entirely on wild bees to pollinate their crops. Take that, CCD!

Ergo: More consumers eating pasture-raised meat for climate and health reasons means more pasture, which in turn means more bees and less money spent by farmers to pollinate their crops. It’s all proof that when we dedicate ourselves to ethical eating, the rewards to ourselves — and the bees! — keep coming.

Read this and learn why being a vegetarian for 1 day a week could make such a huge difference!

recyclableornot:

POWERFUL imagery. 
A little bit more on the world’s water shortage problems:
http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/opinion/story.html?id=5fae1bbc-e8db-4edb-8a65-a0604185a9d0

Truth.


recyclableornot:

POWERFUL imagery. 

A little bit more on the world’s water shortage problems:

http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/opinion/story.html?id=5fae1bbc-e8db-4edb-8a65-a0604185a9d0

Truth.

(via tearriffic-deactivated20111218-)

Some of the natural gas industry’s talking points re: hydrofracking.

inothernews:

Know them well, since it’s obvious they do.

  • We’ve been doing this process for 50-60 years / since the 1950’s / for decades.  As if to say this is nothing new.  But there weren’t millions of natural gas wells in the 1950’s, son, as there are today.  We’re not fucking stupid, okay?
  • The chemical solution used in hydrofracking is mostly water and sand — with some chemicals.  That’s sort of like saying that Coca-Cola is mostly water and corn when in fact it’s mostly water and high-fructose corn syrup.
  • That footage of people setting their tap water aflame by simply holding a lighter next to the stream?  It’s merely naturally-occurring methane gas.  How serendipitous!  Just ignore the natural gas well mere yards away from your property, pumping chemicals into the water table!  And stop smoking, for God’s sake!  That way you won’t need lighters!  And this sort of shit happens all the time!  Go on, DO try this at home!
  • It’s all about national security!!!  Never mind that your public water supply is endangered.  That has nothing to do with national security!!!  Just your insecurity.  About the way the natural gas industry does things!
  • It’s called “hydraulic fracturing,” not “fracking.”  Because “fracking” is what their industry is doing to the environment.
It’s SO important to know this. Don’t be fooled by the term “natural” in natural gas. The process of getting the underground gas alone, uses over 500 different kinds of chemicals. And the neighboring communities suffer horrendously from the adverse affects.

ellobofilipino:

Today is World Environment Day

Hey, hey! Check this out!


ellobofilipino:

Today is World Environment Day

Hey, hey! Check this out!

Wind Turbine Bridge Transforms Italian Viaduct Into Public Space
Woah…


Wind Turbine Bridge Transforms Italian Viaduct Into Public Space

Woah…

What’s your pledge?


What’s your pledge?

  • Don’t forget that everyday can be Earth Day! Here’s a few things you should know about water.

  • ellobofilipino:

    Since aside from Good Friday, today is Earth Day

    Terry, Hofstra’s Sustainability Officer, lent me a few wise words when she told me that “Every job is a ‘Green’ job.” Its true you know. You can always do your part! Whether it means recycling at your job, building sustainable architecture, or simply educating your friends on the many important issues of environmentalism. You can even educate yourself! Everyone can do something. 

    Happy Earth Day! 

  • 1 2 3   Next »